Since its establishment in 1958, the US space agency NASA budget has made many great achievements. From the moon’s visit, the number of times humans have been able to set foot on the moon to this day six times, through the development of laboratories and research machines on The surface of Mars or its reach to most of the galaxies and objects in our solar system, and the discovery of many dwarf asteroids that were not previously discovered.
Achievements with NASA budget
Over the course of 57 years, NASA budget has achieved many achievements and renewed many of the concepts and theories about our planet and the system in which it was. Neil Armstrong, through the Apollo mission, landed on the moon for the first time in 1969, Gets the first picture of the blue ball that billions live on.
The spacecraft Voyager 1 finally exited the solar system for the first time, taking a picture of all the planets of the system from 3.7 billion miles, the so-called Family Portrait.
NASA budget is still following its spectacular exploratory expeditions. In July, the agency was able to take pictures of Pluto, discovered since 1930, 3 billion miles away. The picture, which has become the world’s most recent talk through social media, especially Facebook and Twitter, took nine years to capture that proximity.
Despite decades and years of great achievements, some people think that funding NASA budget is a waste of money, thinking huge sums are being spent on their projects. But if we go astray, we have a lot of financial management done by the agency.
The real NASA budget
After the launch of Sputnik, the first satellite launched into space by the Soviet Union in 1957, American President Dwight D. Eisenhower realized that America was about to lose the race to space. NASA budget was created the following year to trade Soviet development in that field.
Since the end of the Apollo mission in 1971, NASA budget has been working on an average of 0.5% of the total US budget. Although this figure looks great for many people, there is a big difference when we compare what the agency is doing now and What was spent on “Apollo”.
When President Kennedy decided in 1961 that Apollo would be sent to space before the end of that decade, every US citizen had to pay $ 20 a year for NASA. According to our calculations, $ 26 is equivalent to about $ 200 – , Even if NASA was going on like this, ie, taking $ 20 a year from every US citizen, its budget in 2015 would have reached $ 65 billion, while its actual budget was only $ 17.6 billion.
Since 1971, the NASA budget has not increased from the total budget of the United States of America, but has been reduced at varying rates for 45 years. While the Apollo budget is much more than the NASA budget now as a whole, the question is, What if NASA budget could get financial support that way again?
Trump lowers NASA’s space budget for space
US President-elect Donald Trump is preparing to cut NASA’s budget for climate change to the goal of sending humans to the edge of the solar system by the end of this century and possibly sending people back to the moon.
Trump, who described climate change as a “Chinese hoax,” is believed to want to focus the agency’s work on long-range access and visible targets in deep space rather than “climate-focused spending on Earth”
Bob Walker, who advised Trump on space policy, said NASA had been reduced to a “logistics agency focused on re-supplying the space station and politically monitoring the environmental change.”
“We will begin extending the goal of exploring the whole solar system by the end of the century,” said Walker, a former congressman who headed the US space industry future committee under George W. Bush’s son, the Telegraph.
Walker noted the importance of “expanding technological expertise and creating technologies that would not have been necessary” if they were not discovered. “I think inspirational goals are a good thing,” he said. “Fifty years ago we had the ability to go to the moon.”
The NASA budget Department of Earth Sciences received $ 1.92 billion in funding this year, nearly 30% more than last year. The department saw its funding rise by 50% during the Barack Obama era, which also cut $ 840 million in support for exploration Deep space for next year.
Earth science funding is being spent on projects such as the Global Hurricane Satellite Navigation System, a group of 8 satellites designed to monitor the speed of surface winds over the oceans.
After NASA’s Trump won the presidency on November 9, NASA science director Thomas Zorupuken defended the agency’s work. “NASA’s work on earth science makes a difference in the lives of people around the world every day. Earth science helps save lives.”
But the Republicans, they said, complained that the agency that sent men to the moon should not spend billions of dollars on “weather forecasting.”
a good opportunity to lead Trump presidency to the return of man to the moon again, pointing out that under the program of stars of former President Bush, a return trip to the moon was planned in 2020, but Obama canceled.
However, many of the equipment for the trip will be ready, and Trump receives tips from several personalities keen to launch a new lunar journey, as the cornerstone of a trip to Mars.